The Web 2.0 dilemma
by Johannes Bhakdi 2 years ago
Consider these
numbers: of the 1.4 billion Internet users in 2008, approximately 250 million
actively publish and share content on platforms like Facebook, YouTube, Flickr,
Wordpress and many others. Of these 250
million, around 30 million people are semi-professional or professional online
authors, meaning they publish at least once a week. All these numbers are
growing at a rate of approximately 20% per year.

And here comes
the surprise: of all these active online publishers, only 250,000 make a living
off publishing. That’s 0.1% of online publishers, and less than 1% of
semi-professionals and professionals. In other words: in the Web 2.0, over 99%
of mind and financial potential remains untapped. Ouch.
We are not
talking about a hypothetical situation in a distant future, in which people
start doing things that they currently aren’t thinking of, i.e. assuming that
all of the 1.4 billion internet users engage in in the production of content.
No, we are talking about the people who are already, right now, investing a lot
of time, effort and skill in online publishing. 30 million bloggers, video and
music producers, visual artists and experts who publish online on an ongoing
basis. Considering these numbers, the Web 2.0 is the world’s largest profit
disaster. Never before in history have so many people engaged in producing
media value and earned so little with it. Following this new perspective on the
Web 2.0, the impressive content explosion we have witnessed can also be
interpreted very differently: user-generated content technologies have brought
down the average wage for content producers from $25+/hour to $0.25/hour.
The Web 2.0 is a
technology that has diminished the return on content production by 99%.The
reasons for the Web 2.0 disastrous profitability lies in the details of how
user-generated content works today. Three factors – complexity of rich media
publishing, obstacles in marketing and traffic generation, and a lack of
monetization efficiency – lead to an extreme level of inefficiency for online
publishers.
The Web 2.0 has
unleashed the greatest growth curve for human content production in history. At
the same time, it has reduced the average hourly wage for creative publishers
by 99%.
This means two
things: first, the Web 2.0 is on to something big. Its technologies and
paradigms have proven to move the masses, and incur change on a grand scale.
Second, its true
potential will remain untapped unless we find a way to create more powerful
incentives for everyone to engage in the production of high value content. Most
likely, these incentives need to be monetary in nature in order to free world’s
creative resources on a larger scale.
As long as the
profit disaster of the Web 2.0 remains unsolved, the true content revolution
cannot happen.
Don’t forget to join the discussion at my Web 3.0 group!This article is part of Web 3.0 – the book by Johannes Bhakdi, available on sophotec.com
Comments:
Currently no Klatch has been posted.

