|
Now out:
Truth and Trust in the Web 3.0
Click here
Share this page
Truth and Trust in the Web 3.0
Here comes a
funny story. I recently spoke to Julien Smith and Chris Brogan, super-cool
Social Media innovators and authors of the NYT bestseller "Trust
Agents". During the interview, I asked them "What is a Truth Agent
for you" - instead of asking "What is a Trust Agent". Major
mistake! Was it really?
The reason for
my fauxpas was that I was writing this blog post right here at the same time
about truth in the Web 3.0. And my little glitch turned out to be pretty
inspiring. Because trust and truth are not aliens to each other, but siblings
in spirit.
An important
condition for the rise of the Web 3.0 - a web in that everyone becomes a media
entrepreneur through user-generated business technologies - is in an increased
effectiveness of Social Media connectivity. To suceed as a knowledge producer
or creative author online, you need to get the right audience, and build a
lasting bond between you, other content creators of your kind, and your
audience. Social Media is the key. Yet, after conducting a lot of research,
analysis and thinking for my next project, "Social Media Magic", an
interesting point becomes clear: success in Social Media does not so much
depend on the right use of technology. Actually, it's pretty hard to misuse the
current, very simple technologies. It is much more about doing the right things
with it in regards of content. If you tweet, tweet the right things. If you
blog, blog the right things. If you create and manage your group, create the
right group and manage it in the right way. Forget about finding the best
technology (just use what's there), and working on design. Do the right things.
Which finally
brings us to the decisive question: what is the right thing to do in the Social
Web? Here, Chris and Julien hit the right button: it is all about trust. You
need to do things that increase trust. And In a world in that everyone can talk
to everyone else, and millions of marketers try to sell something to anyone
they can get, you need to earn your trust.
From your
perspective - the perspective of someone who wants to attract and keep the
right people - the most important component for building trust is to become
truthful. If you tweet, don't just tweet to send out a link to your product. If
you blog, don't just blog to sell. People do not read blogs to buy anything in
the first place - they trust you to write something that is of value for them.
The central point of the Social Web is that people trust each other to deliver
content that has an inherent value, and serves the primary purpose of
delivering this value. Not to sell. Not to get leads.
What has this
to do with truth? Well, if someone views your content, you obviously implicitly
promised something he or she found intriguing. And if you did so, you need to
deliver on this promise - otherwise, you didn't tell the truth. If I promise an
article "Truth and Trust in the Web 3.0" and then just write: truth
and trust are very important - buy my book and you will get the big
picture", I implicitly lied to you.
Of course, the
concept of truth reaches further than that. It is also about your products. The
amazing thing is that the Social Web reduces the distance between people in an
unprecendented way - which not only means you can talk to much more people directly,
but also that you cannot escape if you do something wrong. If you screw up a product,
people will know you. They will stay in your networks. And they will know you
suck. On the opposite, with increased closeness, delivering value is being much
more rewarded than in an offline consumer world. Your fans, partners and
customers will spread the word about your product. They will praise you, your
truthful approach, and the quality you deliver.
Yes, I believe
in 2010 the world has become a better place. Because today, human networks
become larger and yet more effective. I always viewed the old behavioral
patterns in marketing and sales as slightly desperate, as something driven by
people who naturally experience constant rejection by strangers, and who in
return decided to trick their way into a short-term win of trust - only to see
that the abuse of trust leads to the termination of the relationship. In the
new world of Social Media, I believe that the classic from of marketing where
you pitch something in 30 seconds to strangers is over, and everything connected
to it is, too. Success in the Web 3.0 is about focusing on quality products,
delivering quality content with intrinsic editorial value around them, and
talking the truth about both.
This means: if
you are a small business, or author, or creative, don't try to convince people
all the time. Focus on making your product as high-value as possible, get it
out, create content around what you really care about, and start building a
Social Media publishing outlet.
If you are big,
radically shift your marketing budgets into creating high-quality,
customer-centric products, including consumer insight research and innovation,
and build high-quality editorial online power in the topics of strategic brand
value.
Building Truth
and Trust in the Web 3.0 means to re-assign your marketing dollars and -efforts
into product value improvements, and producing the highest possible content
value in your Social Media outlet.
It's a radical
concept. But radical is also the change the world of marketing and media is undergoing
right now. Rather than being scared, all of us should be excited about it. Because
in the end, we will have more truth and more trust between all of us.
Here comes a
funny story. I recently spoke to Julien Smith and Chris Brogan, super-cool
Social Media innovators and authors of the NYT bestseller "Trust
Agents". During the interview, I asked them "What is a Truth Agent
for you" - instead of asking "What is a Trust Agent". Major
mistake! Was it really?
The reason for
my fauxpas was that I was writing this blog post right here at the same time
about truth in the Web 3.0. And my little glitch turned out to be pretty
inspiring. Because trust and truth are not aliens to each other, but siblings
in spirit.
An important
condition for the rise of the Web 3.0 - a web in that everyone becomes a media
entrepreneur through user-generated business technologies - is in an increased
effectiveness of Social Media connectivity. To suceed as a knowledge producer
or creative author online, you need to get the right audience, and build a
lasting bond between you, other content... more
web 3.0, Truth, Trust, Social Media, Web 3.0
Meaning, the Web 3.0, and the Semantic Web vs. User-generated business
When I discuss the Web 3.0 with friends or viewers, they often ask me: why is Sophotec taking on a topic that already seems being occupied by the term "Semantic Web" - a concept that seems to be competing with "User-generated media business"?
First of all, there is a little overlap: the Semantic Web - a term I don't like at all because it lacks a clear definition and is not supported by any meaningful outline - somehoe connects everything in a smart way. User-generated business techchnologies have to improve the level of effectiveness in connecting the right people and the right content with each other.
But second, and most importantly, I believe that all of us - authors and readers engaged in futurism, the web and innovation - need to become more meaningful when shaping and defining terms. Often, I get a cynical smile when I mention the Web 3.0. Too many people abuse powerful terms like this, or Social Media, to simply say something. Anything. It is important that we do not jsut create phrases that sound good, but take care that we thoroughly derive the definition of new phrases like the Web 3.0. That they come from somewhere (the history of the Web, the Web 1.0, and the Web 2.0), and that they point towards something of meaning. The Semantic Web doesn't - it's simply the idea of some smart web that knows everything. The Web 3.0 as user-generated business builds on a clear historic trajectory, and points out a well grounded roadmap to how we can achieve trillions of additional GDP growth, as well as significant social progress and cultural enrichment. The Semantic Web, on the other hand, is a concept that breaks with the trajectory of the Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 as aspects of social change rather than changes in software technology, and is both blurry and inconsistent in terms of what it is or will be, how it works and, before all, what the social impact will be compared to the Web 2.0 and Web 1.0. The Web 2.0 was not a new technology, but a new way to utilize web technology in social terms. It describes a major social and civilizational shift in the way we interact, produce and share content - and any definition of the Web 3.0 should follow this social perspective to remain consistent and meaningful.
The way to get to a more meaningful definition of jey phrases is to first think about the meaning of things, and engineer our concepts and believes accordingly. A way that delivers a vision, grounded in facts and history, for a better future. This is why we are here - to connect the dots, make them meaningful, and create the blueprints for a future that matters to all of us.
When I discuss the Web 3.0 with friends or viewers, they often ask me: why is Sophotec taking on a topic that already seems being occupied by the term "Semantic Web" - a concept that seems to be competing with "User-generated media business"?First of all, there is a little overlap: the Semantic Web - a term I don't like at all because it lacks a clear definition and is not supported by any meaningful outline - somehoe connects everything in a smart way. User-generated business techchnologies have to improve the level of effectiveness in connecting the right people and the right content with each other.But second, and most importantly, I believe that all of us - authors and readers engaged in futurism, the web and innovation - need to become more meaningful when shaping and defining terms. Often, I get a cynical smile when I mention the Web 3.0. Too many people abuse powerful terms like this, or Social Media, to... more
Win a Web 3.0 book!
In recent days, a series of friends and readers asked me two questions:
1) "Can I get a free copy of Web 3.0 - the book?" and 2) "How can I become a guest author at sophotec.com?"
OK, first of all: the fastest and best way to get Web 3.0 - the book is to BUY it, because it provides incredible insights, visual models and inspiration for only $29. It is unique both in content and form. You will not find anything comparable anywhere. Second: you can always submit articles to jb@sophotec.com - if it's on strategy and supports our pursuit of progress in knowledge, the web and Social Media, I will be happy to publish it.
But you are right - it would be nice to bring these two points together. So from now on, we will give away one book for free to the best article on the Web 3.0 that gets published on sophotec.com/blog. It will be awesome to get all your ideas and thoughts, and I am really excited about getting your mails!
Here are the rules:
- your post have to deal with the Web 3.0 and why everyone becomes a media entrepreneur. It can be about online publishing, blogging, monetization, visionary stuff, social impact or anything else connected to the Web 3.0.
It must meet the following criteria:
- 300-600 words
- Include a picture (profile pic, illustration etc. - no copyright violations, please)
- Describe your case, your budget, what you did, how it worked, and what you think were your success factors
- Provide a short (max. 3 lines) description of yourself, your blog etc. and back-link URL
- We only publish original content that has not been published before.
If you meet these criteria and match the editorial standards, you will be published. Among the published articles, the post with the most views and comments wins. Each comment counts as 10 views - hey, and no cheating, please.
I will answer every submission, promised!
Let the games begin :)
Cheers
Johannes
In recent days, a series of friends and readers asked me two questions: 1) "Can I get a free copy of Web 3.0 - the book?" and 2) "How can I become a guest author at sophotec.com?"OK, first of all: the fastest and best way to get Web 3.0 - the book is to BUY it, because it provides incredible insights, visual models and inspiration for only $29. It is unique both in content and form. You will not find anything comparable anywhere. Second: you can always submit articles to jb@sophotec.com - if it's on strategy and supports our pursuit of progress in knowledge, the web and Social Media, I will be happy to publish it. But you are right - it would be nice to bring these two points together. So from now on, we will give away one book for free to the best article on the Web 3.0 that gets published on sophotec.com/blog. It will be awesome to get all your ideas and thoughts, and I am really excited about getting your mails!Here are the rules:... more
Copyrights in a value-driven Web 3.0
Recently,
I spoke at BIL 2010 in Long Beach about the Web 3.0, and got some interesting questions
from the audience. One of them was: “How do you deal with copyrights in the Web
3.0 and protect people who pour more energies into creating high value content
from being pirated?”
This
question touches one of the most exciting aspects of a web in that everyone
becomes a media entrepreneur. To better understand it, we first have to get a clearer
picture of the copyright problem in general. This problem is based on a simple
perception: if you have something valuable, and sell it, people can steal it.
And then you cannot sell it anymore. With content, it’s even worse than with
physical goods, because simply looking at something is enough to “steal” it. Technically,
a copyright violation starts even if you allow too many people to watch your
DVD. Based on this perception, the traditional media industry has created a
major effort to hunt down the violators – only to find out that they have to
basically hunt down everybody, including their kids, spouses and themselves.
Which
leads us to an interesting question: is honoring copyrights a civilizational meme
comparable to, let’s say, honoring physical property that only takes some time
to diffuse through our social conscience – or is it fundamentally inoperative?
The
problem is that stealing content doesn’t even match the definition of stealing:
you are not taking anything away. The other one still has it. The damage you do
is highly virtual: it is the hypothetical opportunity cost of not buying the
content because you already have it.
I
think the ethical debate is pretty useless, because it’s simply not a pragmatic
step to solve the problem. Instead, I propose to think a little bit out-of the
box. Content is different from physical goods, and it doesn’t make sense to
think in the wrong reference system. If you have created a piece of content,
you don’t want to protect it from copyright violations – you want to monetize
it as much as possible. The monetization of content requires marketing and
monetary transaction. Utilizing parts of your content for free distribution
actually increases your traffic and the awareness for your stuff, so it’s a
good thing. On the other hand, if everyone can access the whole thing for free,
you don’t earn money except for some advertising dimes. My experience is that the
online content business is much more about convenience than it is about criminal
or non-criminal intent. People want to view your content, they are willing to
pay for it if they trust it’s good, but if it is too easy to get it for free or
it is too expensive to buy, then they go for piracy. In the end, it is about
figuring out the balance between freebies, the protection of your core content
products by practical means (e.G., print the buyers name on the document), and
maintaining a personal and friendly relationship with your community. Two
things are definitely the wrong thing to do: hiring a lawyer to go after
copyright violators, and not allowing anyone to see anything before they pay.
Because they won’t.
There
is no simple solution – but there are solutions. Go with the flow, avoid major disruptions
of your viewers experience, and elegantly intertwine premium content with a free
flow of sniplets that engage, entertain and intrigue.
That’s
at least how I do it, and it works so far :)
Recently,
I spoke at BIL 2010 in Long Beach about the Web 3.0, and got some interesting questions
from the audience. One of them was: “How do you deal with copyrights in the Web
3.0 and protect people who pour more energies into creating high value content
from being pirated?”
This
question touches one of the most exciting aspects of a web in that everyone
becomes a media entrepreneur. To better understand it, we first have to get a clearer
picture of the copyright problem in general. This problem is based on a simple
perception: if you have something valuable, and sell it, people can steal it.
And then you cannot sell it anymore. With content, it’s even worse than with
physical goods, because simply looking at something is enough to “steal” it. Technically,
a copyright violation starts even if you allow too many people to watch your
DVD. Based on this perception, the traditional media industry has created... more
What is the market potential of user-generated content?
Maybe you think “that’s
a weird question”. But when we talk about the Web 3.0 and user generated media
business, both startups and Venture Capitalists will ask exactly this question:
what is the real value potential for empowering everyone to earn money from creating
content?
There are many
ways to approach this topic – most prominently, using the current size of the
market or that of neighboring industries like the book market. If the US book market
has a total turnover of, let’s say, $50 billion, we can start making
assumptions about how much of this amount is generated online, and what the
potential of a self-publishing author vs. a professionally published author is.
I think this
approach is wrong.
Because the
content industry, as of today, doesn’t really exist. Content today is created
and processed in a manual, highly inefficient way. Media products are not part
of a larger processing and application system. Knowledge, as the most
significant source of value in the industry, is still in a baby state, not much
higher developed than in ancient Greece 2500 years ago. There are no systematic
problem identification systems and markets, no large scale knowledge unit mass
production, no automated knowledge application, feedback loops and
re-engineering processes. A publishing company today has as much in common with
an advanced knowledge company as Johannes Gutenberg’s printing machine had with
a blogging platform.
To estimate the
true market potential of a future content industry, we first need to define and
understand what content actually IS. Content is actually everything people can publish,
and that other people can absorb into their brains. It is mindware – the stuff that
makes up our minds.
The value of mindware originates from two sources: from the mere
pleasure it creates through logical insight or emotional inspiration, and from
allowing us to create more value in the physical world by providing us with the
mental and behavioral patterns that solve problems.
While the first
source of value is similar to other goods in the sense that it is limited to satisfying
a part of our need portfolio, the second one is special. If content includes
all mindware that helps us to solve problems and basically create all other
kinds of content, it is different from nearly all other goods we know. Because
in this case, it’s market potential is unlimited. Let me explain why:
The idea of a
market potential stands in direct correlation with the idea of value creation. The
market potential of an industry equals its maximum level of value creation and
contribution in the total economic mix of things. For example, the auto-market has
a certain maximum size, because it’s unlikely that people will commit more of
their resources to it than the healthy equilibrium between the other goods they
want.
But when it comes
to content as the tool to generate solutions, things change. Because what
exactly is the amount of money people would possibly spent on solutions? Right,
it’s 100% of their money. Because everything people want are solutions:
solutions for their needs and problems. Now, we have to consider that knowledge
is only part of the solution. The other part will be the physical goods and resources
required to build the solution. But knowledge always is a part of any solution,
and probably the most important part.
If we apply some
simple metrics to the value of knowledge – or conceptual content – in environments
where there already are higher developed content based approaches such as
construction, machinery and others, the fair share of value conceptual development
gets is normally roundabout 10-20% (think about your architect, or engineering blueprints).
If we assume that
the Web 3.0 – a web that effectively unleashes large scale content and
knowledge production for all areas of life – is capable of turning our society
in an advanced knowledge civilization in that literally every challenge and
problem is solved through systematic production and exchange of knowledge, and
that the fair share of value the content behind it gets is the same as in
developed knowledge industries, that would end up being 10%-20% of… everything.
Everything equals the world GDP, which is something around $65 trillion.
Do I seriously believe
that the Web 3.0 has a market potential of $6.5 - $13 trillion? Yes, I do.
Because these are not empty figures – these figures represent the largest civilizational
leap humankind has ever experienced. If everyone starts systematically
producing knowledge, aligning his or her thinking capacities to the market
regulated needs of all others, and get’s rewarded instantly based on the true
value that was delivered, a few trillion dollars are the least spectacular thing
we will witness.
Maybe you think “that’s
a weird question”. But when we talk about the Web 3.0 and user generated media
business, both startups and Venture Capitalists will ask exactly this question:
what is the real value potential for empowering everyone to earn money from creating
content?There are many
ways to approach this topic – most prominently, using the current size of the
market or that of neighboring industries like the book market. If the US book market
has a total turnover of, let’s say, $50 billion, we can start making
assumptions about how much of this amount is generated online, and what the
potential of a self-publishing author vs. a professionally published author is. I think this
approach is wrong. Because the
content industry, as of today, doesn’t really exist. Content today is created
and processed in a manual, highly inefficient way. Media products are not part
of a larger processing and application system.... more
web 3.0, value, user-generated content, Web 3.0
The future of the Internet: from Web 1.0 to Web 3.0
Some people think
whoever wants to shape the future shouldn’t look back into the past. Others
believe only the past can reveal the future. I believe that only a decent
understanding of the past allows to build a future that lasts; but that,
equally important, we must let go of the past and present to make the leap of
faith true progress requires.
So when I take
you on a journey into the future of the Web – the Web 3.0 – I want to start with
a look back into history. Move to the present. And do the leap into a Web in
that everyone becomes a media entrepreneur.
Beginnings:
the Web 1.0
When the Internet
was invented, all it was at first was a bunch of computers empowered to
communicate with each other using TCP/IP, a protocol (a set of rules and
standards) that enabled a group of computers to connect in an orderly way.
The presence of
this early web was limited to some research and military labs, and not too many
people were aware of its existence. Slowly, following the open nature of
TCP/IP, the Internet grew by adding more and more computers in more and more
labs – and so did its appeal. Suddenly, researchers could communicate with each
other through what we now call websites and email, post new ideas or just
entertaining stories online, and thusly access every connected computer in
real-time. It didn’t take too long until, in the mid-1990s, the Internet had
outgrown the boundaries of labs and restricted installations, and was on its
way to become a mass phenomenon.
And as so often
in history, the first people pouring serious energy and resources into the
usage and development of the web were the people who sensed the sweet smell of
money: Business people. And one of the first, most obvious business
applications of this new technology was the distribution of content (or, in
other words, publishing).
Think about it: a
new technology evolves which is used by more and more people. Its potential is
huge, because every computer on earth can potentially be connected. Anyone who
has something to say can set up a website, and be viewed by everyone else more
or less for free. The industry most obviously connected to a technology of this
nature is the industry that deals with access and awareness – the industry that
is capable of turning eyeballs into money.
 If we want to
turn this first wave of global online publishing activity into a visual model,
some basic underlying principles become obvious: someone (let’s call her
“author” (a)) wanted to publish something and used web technology to create a
website (e). In case of larger institutions, the technological and
publishing-related activities were planned and coordinated by a manager (b) who
controlled the process. Even in the case of student groups or individuals,
someone managed the web page.
Once the webpage
was ready, it was published – in Internet terms, this means just being put
online – and made available to everybody. Now, the special thing about the
internet as opposed to other media was that users (d) has a much larger choice
what media they wanted to access: Suddenly, the could choose not from a limited
and controlled number of magazines or TV channels, but from a number of
websites that was constantly growing and wasn’t controlled by anyone. The Web
1.0 created “user generated choice” (1).
But except for
this twist, there were not too many differences to the old media world. The Web
1.0 worked very similarly to traditional publishing: content needed to be
created, put into the right format, targeted at the right group, and managed by
someone who understood what the purpose and return on invest was. In other
words, the Web 1.0 was simply another way to do the same thing everyone did
before: push content to consumers, only this time through a new channel which
behaved slightly differently. The result was obvious. The content available was
not much different from what was offered before. If people saw revolutionary
potential, it was seen exclusively in
terms of access: everyone could now instantly access all the stuff professional
publishers created. Following the bottleneck logic of editors-only content
creation, the content variety in the Web
1.0 was heavily limited (e).
Web 2.0 user-generated
content
When exactly the
Web 2.0 was invented is hard to say. Some name the blogging company Wordpress
as the first true Web 2.0 company, others attribute that title to Wikipedia.
But before we get
lost in the search for the first person who thought about or mentioned the Web
2.0, let’s first understand what it exactly is. And the first insight is
nothing short of stunning: the Web 2.0 was actually not at all a technological
innovation.
It was a simple
idea: allowing users to generate their
own content on a prefabricated web page.
That might sound
trivial today, and it was technologically trivial in the 1990s. But in terms of
social implications, perception, and innovating the idea of publishing, it was
a truly revolutionary approach.
Let’s try to understand it a little better:
Basically, all
that early Web 2.0 entrepreneurs did was switching a metaphorical software
lever from “Professional Authors Only” to “Everyone”. The content management or authoring platforms
(a) could now be used by all users (b) by simply signing up with an email
address and password, and were designed around a very different idea. Everyone
could publish, and everyone could create his or her own little webpage without
any technical knowledge. The formerly hand-picked, professionally edited content became user-generated
content (2). Now, everyone could start
publishing on the web. The available content variety (c) started to grow and
grow while more and more people explored the possibilities of personal online
publishing through blogs and content sharing sites.
 What didn’t change was the
business side: The new Web 2.0
companies were still managed by teams or professional managers (d) who
controlled 100 % of financial logics and value building.
The core problem
in the Web 2.0 today is: no one (except for managers and entrepreneurs) gets
paid. And as long as this problem prevails, both the quality and the value of
content cannot excel to its full potential. People cannot commit the time and
effort into creating high quality content. The true revolution of the human
mind cannot happen.
Web 3.0 - Everyone
becomes a media entrepreneur
Unlocking the
vast potentials of a limitless mind market requires everyone to become a media
entrepreneur. Since most creative authors are neither business afficianados nor
tech geeks, this requirement can only be met if technology makes managing a
media business as easy as generating content. This is the simple but
groundbreaking idea of the Web 3.0: to let technology do the same for media
value creation what it has done for content generation: To go from
user-generated content to user-generated business.
The empowerment
of users to build their own online media asset (a) is based on three key
components that together constitute the architecture of the Web 3.0. First,
user-generated media platforms that substitute the simple content sharing tools
of the Web 2.0 (b). These platforms allow users to maximize their content value
through structured, rich content publishing which builds their brands and
integrates media products. Second, user-generated traffic tools that allow
authors to utilize their content to reach out into the Social Web, connect to
their target groups and build sustainable communities (c). And third,
user-generated business platforms (d) that provide users with easy to use tools
to embed advertising, digital sales and e-commerce in their content, control
and improve their profitability and do financial optimization around their
revenue streams.
 While most of the
technology components of the Web 3.0 already exist, the decisive step will be
their factual integration into a seamless user experience. Like the Web 2.0
could only prosper once publishing and sharing content became as easy as a
mouse click, the Web 3.0 revolution will take place from the moment where the
first platform offers a fully functional, smooth and easy media business
technology for everyone.
Some people think
whoever wants to shape the future shouldn’t look back into the past. Others
believe only the past can reveal the future. I believe that only a decent
understanding of the past allows to build a future that lasts; but that,
equally important, we must let go of the past and present to make the leap of
faith true progress requires.
So when I take
you on a journey into the future of the Web – the Web 3.0 – I want to start with
a look back into history. Move to the present. And do the leap into a Web in
that everyone becomes a media entrepreneur.Beginnings:
the Web 1.0
When the Internet
was invented, all it was at first was a bunch of computers empowered to
communicate with each other using TCP/IP, a protocol (a set of rules and
standards) that enabled a group of computers to connect in an orderly way.
The presence of
this early web was limited to some research and military labs, and not too... more
Web 3.0, Future of internet, web 3.0
The Web is changing
Yes, the impact of the Internet is big—big on everything. In
the last five years alone, the lives of more than 500 million people have been
changed by tweets, Facebook updates,
YouTube videos and the blogosphere. And it’s those 500
million people who have the strongest impact on the future of the planet. The
new infrastructure that has led to such significant change is commonly called
“the Web 2.0,” which is driven by the paradigm of user-generated content and
the Social Web. For the first time in human history, over one billion people
have access to a level playing-field, on which they can influence, connect
with, and publish and distribute work to other people. The Web 2.0 has
transformed human civilization at its core by creating a network that has the potential to connect
every single mind of humankind.
Given this extremely significant achievement, I have to
reassess my first sentence: the impact of the Internet, compared to its
fundamentally important position, is actually marginal. For most people,
neither Facebook nor twitter nor blogs are more than a little entertainment on
the side. In the grand scheme of things, the Web 2.0 is of marginal importance—compared
to their healthcare, finances, families, jobs, or even their cars. The reason is simple: Facebook cannot heal
cancer, reading a blog doesn’t make you rich, and Twitter doesn’t solve your
family problems. Of course they don’t.
But then, what can? Who, actually, CAN solve all the
problems that haunt our planet, and help you tackle the challenges of your
daily life? The answer is simple, and hasn’t changed since the rise of homo
sapiens: yourself, and others. In other words: US. Yes, we can solve every
problem, and overcome every challenge, if we only know how, know who and know
why.
Until now, this was easily said , but rarely done: Getting
the knowledge and manpower to solve a problem was restricted by your network,
resources and political or business skills. You could connect to a few friends
or family members, or seek out one or two experts. Even a head of state could
only tap into the minds of a few hundred experts and staff, maybe even a
thousand if he was lucky. Removing this restriction would have an impact on our
world and lives that can hardly be imagined. It would be game changer – not a
game changer for a business or industry, but for human existence itself.
Has the current Web 2.0 led to this change? Not in any
significant way. You can meet people, but you cannot access their minds - at
least not the part that matters. You can read their tweets and status updates
and 30-second videos. But you cannot read their specific, unique mental models;
their insights on the world.; the bits of imagination that will shape the future;
their brilliant concepts that could solve your problem; their pieces of art
that will give you the inspiration you seek. The Web 2.0 fails at large at
providing valuable content.
The Web 2.0 has created an infrastructure in that publishing
and information now grows at a
breathtaking speed, and the information being published grows on an exponential
trajectory. This book is about the vision and blueprint of turning this
unprecedented capacity into an infrastructure that produces valuable content.
I have a simple belief. I believe that we, as a
civilization, as of January 2010, hold the key in our hands to solve any
problem, big or small, for countries, businesses and individuals alike, at
lightning speed. Because, for the first time in human history, hundreds of
millions of people are connected, who, together, can do nearly everything. Our
mission is to figure out how we can activate this potential and embed it into
an infrastructure – one in which everyone’s mental potential is leveraged for
everyone else. It is a task that goes well beyond software development and deep
into the logics of human motivation, economic value and social progress. It
will be about a content revolution, a profit dilemma, transformative
capitalism, user-generated media business and… - but wait. Let’s do this
step-by-step. Enjoy a journey into the past, present and future of the web here
on my blog. And don’t forget to join the discussion at my Web 3.0 group!
Cheers,
Johannes
This article is part of Web 3.0 – the book by Johannes
Bhakdi, available on sophotec.com
Yes, the impact of the Internet is big—big on everything. In
the last five years alone, the lives of more than 500 million people have been
changed by tweets, Facebook updates,
YouTube videos and the blogosphere. And it’s those 500
million people who have the strongest impact on the future of the planet. The
new infrastructure that has led to such significant change is commonly called
“the Web 2.0,” which is driven by the paradigm of user-generated content and
the Social Web. For the first time in human history, over one billion people
have access to a level playing-field, on which they can influence, connect
with, and publish and distribute work to other people. The Web 2.0 has
transformed human civilization at its core by creating a network that has the potential to connect
every single mind of humankind.
Given this extremely significant achievement, I have to
reassess my first sentence: the impact of the... more
Web 3.0, web 3.0
Videos on Sophotec.com
Hello friends of Sophotec,
another short update: I recently wrote about the web3.0 coming back . I am currently working on this comeback very hard. So many friends wrote me that they want to know more about the web3.0 as user generated business, and how it relates to social media, marketing, business, the economy, our daily life and creative freedom.
During my preparation, I happened to meet with my friend Dr. Elli Hagen who is preparing a pretty awesome channel here on Klatcher, providing no-nonsense medical advice. I watched her producing videos in her apartment and was honestly blown away by how easy it is to produce very high quality, professional video nowadays. I also was impressed by the power of video if you combine it with a cutting edge, no-nonsense script that delivers the knowledge you need right away. The advantages of videos are that the amount and sophistication of visual models goes down a little bit which relieves me from the challenging task of building 30+ page visual models for each presentation. It's basically about efficiently balancing what's in your head, and how much you can get out in a high quality.
Bottom line: the future of Sophotec will be a blend of video, visual knowledge and a little bit of math to provide the most content in the highest quality.
The timing for the first videos will be the next 4 weeks. And be sure a web3.0 update will be part of the mix!
I am working on first scripts and the key topics, and will publish an update here on the blog soon to get your opinion.
May the future be full of super efficient knowledge :)
Johannes
Hello friends of Sophotec, another short update: I recently wrote about the web3.0 coming back . I am currently working on this comeback very hard. So many friends wrote me that they want to know more about the web3.0 as user generated business, and how it relates to social media, marketing, business, the economy, our daily life and creative freedom. During my preparation, I happened to meet with my friend Dr. Elli Hagen who is preparing a pretty awesome channel here on Klatcher, providing no-nonsense medical advice. I watched her producing videos in her apartment and was honestly blown away by how easy it is to produce very high quality, professional video nowadays. I also was impressed by the power of video if you combine it with a cutting edge, no-nonsense script that delivers the knowledge you need right away. The advantages of videos are that the amount and sophistication of visual models goes down a little bit which relieves me... more
web 3.0, Economy, Marketing, Social Media, Web 3.0
The web 3.0 is back!
While working with a new Klatcher author - Dr. Elli Hagen - who is going to create a video series about medical topics - and discussing what's hot and what's not, I realized a simple fact: thousands of fans on slideshare, here on the official Sophotec page and all over the web want to know more about the web3.0.
My initial presentation from 7 months ago has now over 30,000 views on different spots all over the internet, and ranks between position 1 and 5 on Google. This means: the web3.0 is hot, and my take on it - user generated business, everyone becomes a (media) entrepreneur - got significant resonance in the community. The semantic web as the competing definition is on retreat, and right so. The perspective of the internet as a social and economic phenomenon based on technology seems to generate more interest than a merely math and coding-driven interpretation.
What does this all mean? It means I will do more research and analysis on the effects the web3.0 will have on society, business and you. I want to work on the effects of the web3.0 on different facets of our lives. I want to show that the world's creative minds will be empowered as never before. That the old rules of marketing will be over, and the new rules of publishing are here. That user generated politics will change the way we are governed, and will govern. And finally, that all our lives will be enriched by a new breed of platforms that self-organize the connectivity of minds and the financial valuation of personal publishing.
I will start the production of the web3.0 series asap - if you have ideas or requests for content, write me a comment below.
Thanks for your interest, and stay tuned!
Yours Johannes
While working with a new Klatcher author - Dr. Elli Hagen - who is going to create a video series about medical topics - and discussing what's hot and what's not, I realized a simple fact: thousands of fans on slideshare, here on the official Sophotec page and all over the web want to know more about the web3.0. My initial presentation from 7 months ago has now over 30,000 views on different spots all over the internet, and ranks between position 1 and 5 on Google. This means: the web3.0 is hot, and my take on it - user generated business, everyone becomes a (media) entrepreneur - got significant resonance in the community. The semantic web as the competing definition is on retreat, and right so. The perspective of the internet as a social and economic phenomenon based on technology seems to generate more interest than a merely math and coding-driven interpretation. What does this all mean? It means I will do more... more
Web 3.0, Media, web 3.0
newstream not foundSorry. We have intimately looked into each publication but we could not find what you searched for. Please try something else.
|
|